Prometheus radiology crack the core download torrent

For the sake of future residency classes, please continue fighting the good fight. While not my only resources, I would not have passed the boards without both titan radiology and crack the core. Prometheus and his study materials are the reason me and my 7 co-residents all passed the Core Exam. All of his resources are high yield and should be essential to any resident's study plan!

By far the easiest videos to sit through — your sense of humor was MUCH appreciated, and helped immensely when trying to suffer through otherwise mundane material i. Register Log In. Learn Clinical Radiology The Clinical Mastery Product by Radiology Ronin offers a one of a kind blend of didactic lectures, interactive skill-based sessions, and real world case-based active learning via the one of a kind iRad interface.

Get Instant Access. Featured Products. What Our Customers are Saying. Mohammed Ezuddin Jackson Memorial Hospital. Q: How do you grade this unilateral perfusion defect of the whole lung , but no ventilation defect?

This kind of error is rare, and a single author book without any editorial input is bound to have mistakes. CTC demonstrates an almost aggressive lack of polish. If a source disagrees with CTC, the source is probably right. Specific numbers can be wrong or out of date making them less likely to be tested too , and incomplete descriptions of facts are also common, but again this is a review text for high-yield Core review, so I completely forgive the tailored approach. There are weak Amazon previews for any CTC books, which may be frustrating to potential buyers.

This is one of the downsides of the Amazon de facto e-book monopoly. Apple and Kobo pay a flat percentage. Sales of both volumes are intermittently on hold for the release of updated editions.

Not only do I hold a sincere hope that PL will finally take his errata and typos seriously, but there is an ever-growing list of high yield trivia in each section that are presumably generated from reader…feedback. War Machine is a stand-alone expansion of CTC physics and non-interpretive skills. Both these topics were covered well in CTC Volume 2. To give you an idea of the page difference involved:.

War Machine physics War Machine non-interpretative skills 63 War Machine rapid review And to be honest, much of the text is exactly the same. In fact, whole pages are literally pixel by pixel identical even the typos :. Most of the diagrams are the same and are similar in number. There are an incredible number of typos. A few of these affect understanding saying positron when you mean beta particle , but most are just sloppy. Again, a serious dearth of images, but there are lots of nice crudely drawn diagrams.

There are very few clinical examples with pretty wimpy artifact sections. It, like CTC in general, reads very fast due to big font and generous line spacing. Both books are essentially a re-writing of the relevant RSNA physics modules into as much plain English as possible and do an excellent job.

There is nothing new in the rapid review, just a convenient copy-paste job. Given that physics is the most commonly failed section and currently the only thing you can condition for, it makes sense to take physics very seriously. If you want to work War Machine into your studying, you could conceivably do so in the beginning to finally after years of training to try to understand physics, then read the shorter CTC sections during your dedicated review closer to the exam.

But this is a safe pass if neither of those scenarios appeal to you. Both versions include a fair amount of nitty-gritty details that from my experience were simply not on the Core, which really does have largely clinically relevant physics focused on dose, safety, image quality, and image manipulation.

Both are definitely more on point than Huda. Conversely, neither resource emphasis the relative dose of various exams i. I enjoyed the extra bit of depth and used it to replace not supplement the CTC section.

Great book of low-hanging fruit, solid value. Again, intermittently funny but full of mistakes, like this awesomely reversed labeling of Galeazzi and Monteggia fractures:.