Disaster resilience an integrated approach paton johnston pdf download

By using our site, you agree to our collection of information through the use of cookies. To learn more, view our Privacy Policy. To browse Academia. Log in with Facebook Log in with Google. Remember me on this computer.

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link. Need an account? Click here to sign up. Download Free PDF. Defining and measuring community resilience to natural disasters: a case study from Auckland Douglas Paton. David Johnston. Julia Becker. Michele Daly. A short summary of this paper. Download Download PDF. Translate PDF. When reflecting on this vision, several questions immediately come to mind: what is resilience; how can it be developed; how can it be measured; and how resilient are we right now?

To try and answer these questions in the context of community1 resilience, a research project was undertaken in Auckland between and Paton, ; a; et al, a. The overall goal of the project was to identify key generic attributes of community resilience and develop a way of measuring these, which could be used both at different levels e. The research has provided us with a better understanding of what resilient communities look like.

As a result, a growing number of emergency managers are challenging the way they view, understand and interact with their communities. What is resilience? Since the time of Charles Darwin, scientists studying evolution have sought to understand how some species have been able to survive changes in their environment while others have not. They have identified the key criteria to survival and growth as being the ability of those species to adapt to their changing environment.

In this context, resilience comprises four general components Paton, : 1. Communities, their members, businesses and societal institutions must have the resources e. Communities, their members, businesses and societal institutions must have the competencies and procedures e. The planning and development used to facilitate resilience must be designed to integrate the resources available and to ensure opportunities for change and growth are capitalised on; and 4.

Mechanisms must be in place to ensure the sustained availability of these resources and the competencies required to use them over time and against a background of hazard quiescence and changing community membership, needs, goals and functions. Leonard, W. Paton University of Tasmania. Ronan Central Queensland University. ABSTRACT: Contemporary research has highlighted that improved preparedness is likely to accrue from i enhancing beliefs in the feasibility of mitigating hazard; and ii enhancing beliefs in personal competency to implement these activities.

Changing these factors requires a mix of public education, social policy, training, and empowerment strategies. The design of hazard education programmes should be integrated with community development initiatives and will be more effective than stand alone, one off programmes. School education programmes need to be one of the centrepieces of a sustained, community-based effort.

However, research frequently shows that despite the presence of such programmes the majority of the public do not carry out self-protective measures recommended by emergency management authorities during non-crisis times Paton et al. This questions the value of many public education initiatives. Many initiatives tend to focus only on increasing awareness and knowledge about hazards, but do not address other factors which influence adaptive capacity and resilience.

Knowledge and understanding of hazards is still an important part of the equation, but is only one aspect of many factors that influence preparation, appropriate response during a crisis e.

The design of hazard education programmes should be integrated with community development initiatives and will be more effective than stand alone, one off programmes Finnis et al.

Tying in projects or working with groups that are already active in the community is an efficient way to implement a program because there is local knowledge, established partnerships and existing community participation.

Programs may benefit from having numerous small grants lined up to share costs and to maintain input from smaller stakeholders. Even though a larger project may be more beneficial or appear more impressive, community and stakeholder trust and support will be lost if it does not come to fruition.

However, if addressing this concern is important to the community, then undertaking the project will foster partnerships and community interest in further projects. An empirical evaluation, however, not only can provide documented evidence to prospective stakeholders and participants but also can help identify ways of making the program more efficient or successful or give a measure for comparison to other similar projects.

These key aspects can be used to help guide the development process for education programmes. The design of hazard education programmes should be integrated with community development initiatives and will be more effective than stand alone, one off programs. A move away from mass-media education to sustainable community-based initiatives is more likely to bring about improved community resilience to future disasters.

Am J Community Psychol 41 1—2 — Nat Hazards 59 3 — Paton D Disaster business continuity: promoting staff capability. Disaster Prev Manag Int J 8 2 — Paton D Disaster resilience: Integrating individual, community, institutional, and environmental perspectives. Springfield, Ill, pp — In: Proceedings of the international conference on school safety, vol Islamabad, Pakistan.

Plodinec J Definitions of resilience: An analysis. Traumatology 18 4 — Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2 1 :6— Stevens L, Wrenn C Exploratory qualitative research. Earthquake Spectra 21 S1 — Wedawatta G, Ingirige B Resilience and adaptation of small and medium-sized enterprises to flood risk. Disaster Prev Manag 21 4 — Download references. The authors would like to thank all interviewees who participated in this study. You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar.

Correspondence to Ali Ardalan. Reprints and Permissions. Ostadtaghizadeh, A. Community disaster resilience: a qualitative study on Iranian concepts and indicators. Nat Hazards 83, — Download citation.

Received : 15 October Accepted : 19 May Published : 06 June Issue Date : September Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:.

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. Skip to main content. Search SpringerLink Search. Abstract The concept of community disaster resilience CDR has become one of the most popular terms in disaster literature. References Adiyoso W, Kanegae H The preliminary study of the role of Islamic teaching in the disaster risk reduction a qualitative case study of Banda Aceh, Indonesia. J Relig Spiritual Soc Work Soc Thought 30 3 — Article Google Scholar Alesi P Building enterprise-wide resilience by integrating business continuity capability into day-to-day business culture and technology.