Why huckleberry finn should not be banned essay

Southern lifestyles also involved family feuds and pointless conflicts. An example that illustrates the ignorance and absurdness of family feuds involves the Grangerford family. A rich family who treats him as part of the family takes in huckleberry.

However, he later learns that a feud existed between Grangerfords and another family, the Shepherdsons. The feud eventually leads to the murder of all the Grangerfords by the Shepherdsons in cold blood. This shows the pointless and stupid nature of the family feuds in Southern cities.

In the period leading up to the American Civil War, the customs, as well as the ideals of the North, contrasted significantly with that of the South. The South supported the institution of slavery, while the North opposed it Carey-Webb Nevertheless, mainly the wealthy aristocrats owned slaves; the poor whites could not afford them.

This factor, coupled with territorial conflicts caused by the westward expansion, culminated in the Civil War Carey-Webb Mark Twain uses satire to show the nature of the Southern lifestyle during the slavery era. He satirized slavery by revealing the ridiculous aspects of the Southern lifestyle and as such, calls for its abolition.

Thus, the arguments for the necessity of Huckleberry Finn to be banned in schools because of racism are considered not viable.

During the slavery period, there arose the Abolitionists calling for the ending of slavery. However, some people, especially from the South, defended slavery. Their argument revolved around economics, religion, humanitarianism, and religion. According to Booth, those defending slavery argued that an end to the slave economy would significantly affect the Southern economy , which relied heavily on cotton, rice, and tobacco farming They also held the view that freeing the slaves would result in widespread unemployment, and subsequently, uprisings and chaos.

The defenders of slavery also argued that slavery in America mirrored slavery in other civilizations such as the Roman Empire and the Greek civilization and as such, represented a natural state of humankind. From a religious viewpoint, the defenders of slavery argued that, in religious books such as the Bible, slavery remained widespread with no spiritual leader speaking out against it.

In other words, slavery bore moral justification, as no one opposed it during biblical times. The defenders of slavery also involved the courts to legalize slave trade and slave ownership. Further, they held the view that the Constitution protected the right to ownership of property that included the slaves.

The defenders of the slave trade also argued for the divine nature of slavery. They believed that their introduction of Christianity into Africa helped eliminate heathen practices. According to this argument, slavery was expedient for the slaves as it ended the heathen practices and brought civilization to Central Africa.

Others opposed to those campaigning for an end to slavery argued that the slaves got better care when sick and aged compared to slaves in Europe and the poor Northern States of America.

James Thornwell remarked in that the conflict between those for slavery and those opposing the institution resembled an argument between Atheists and Socialists on one hand and supporters of social order on the other Booth This shows that slavery during this era attracted support from various people in the then American society. After its publication in , the novel was censored the same year by the Concord public library in Massachusetts. Later, it was attacked as containing racist elements.

That sentence alone shows the lies that were spread in order to justify the nature of slavery. I have read a lot of work on slavery thanks to my mother, during my reading I learned about how slaveholders would comment on how their slaves are happy on the plantation.

I also read that slaveholders would claim that they are giving slaves shelter and safety rather than living in the huts in Africa. Discussing the difficulties that Frederick Douglass and other slaves have encountered during the first half of the 19th century. Fearing the ideas of their owned slaves surpassing them in intelligence and overthrowing them. After the Civil War, African Americans went from bondage into gaining liberty. Twentieth President James A.

The ratification of civil rights legislation created only a beginning of a change because the Emancipation Proclamation failed to free all slaves, Whites did not view Blacks as social equals, and most Southern Whites would not cooperate with the new laws. The Emancipation. I think as a nation, we are gradually recovering from the choices made during reconstruction. In conclusion, I think modern day America would not be segregated if during reconstruction, Black people were treated and viewed as.

Slaves were brought into the colonies in , but slavery didn 't end until many years later, in In though, slavery became hereditary in Virginia, meaning that slaves ' children had to be enslaved also.

Many colonies also passed laws that made it illegal to teach slaves to read and write. To me, I think that this is one of the saddest parts of slavery. Number of pages. Email Invalid email. Related Essays. This is just a sample. You can get a custom paper by one of our expert writers.

Stay Safe, Stay Original. Not Finding What You Need? Copying content is not allowed on this website. Give us your email and we'll send you the essay you need. Send me the sample. By clicking Send Me The Sample you agree to the terms and conditions of our service.

We'll not send you spam or irrelevant messages. Revising the original version of the book is not staying true to the period in which Twain was writing.

The language of the book depicts America's past Rawls 1. The language used is appropriate for this specific time period. People would not have referred to slaves or African Americans in any other way. Altering Huckleberry Finn and changing the racial slurs would make the novel lean towards a more fictional direction. Erasing racial labels does not erase race or racism. Wanting the world to be less racist does not give anyone the right to change someone writing.

Being less racist would mean that the world could recognize words and their meanings as a sign of how much we have evolved Dawkins 1. It is wrong to ignore the past simply because we don't know how to explain it. A large part of moving forward in the world depends on addressing problems and difficult situations. People have been reading "Huck Finn" and " Tom Sawyer for over a century and it has not stopped us from evolving and moving past slavery and racism for the most part.

Why should we all We need to remember and acknowledge the fact that these young people are juniors and seniors who differ in ages from 16 to 18 and in some cases are halfway to legal adulthood. The students reading this novel can make decisions for themselves based on what they know as right or wrong.

Reading Huckleberry Finn one time in their literature class will not change that. Huckleberry Finn should not be banned or sanitized because it is a part of American history whether it is good or bad, also we have no right to change someone's writing simply because we do not like how it is written, Mark Twain's writing should not be penalized because of the ideals of today. If you find the book offensive, don't read it or buy it.

There are countless amounts of offensive books that people find no interest in, however that does not mean we change them or rewrite them. Get Access. Better Essays. Fahrenheit Banned Words 3 Pages.