How long did the rosenberg trial last

By , he had assembled an espionage ring of engineers, scientists and machinists that included his old City College classmate Morton Sobell. It also included his brother-in-law David Greenglass, who was then involved with the Manhattan Project — the creation of the atomic bomb — at a facility in Los Alamos, New Mexico. The first shoe to drop in the case came with the arrest of German-born British physicist Klaus Fuchs on February 2, Fuchs had also worked at Los Alamos and passed along information to the Soviets independently of the Rosenbergs, though they shared a crucial link with their courier, Harry Gold.

The dominoes continued to fall with Julius' apprehension in July and Ethel's arrest in August, with Sobell discovered to be hiding in Mexico at that time. Making little attempt to portray himself as impartial, Judge Irving R.

Kaufman opened the proceedings by declaring: "The evidence will show that the loyalty and alliance of the Rosenbergs and Sobell were not to our country, but that it was to Communism. The case against the Rosenbergs largely hinged on the testimonies of Gold and Greenglass. Greenglass testified that the Rosenbergs began lobbying his wife, Ruth, to get her husband involved in the espionage ring by November He returned to New York City on furlough in January , at which point he showed Julius his notes and a sketch of a high-explosive lens.

Even more damning, Greenglass described another meeting at the Rosenbergs' New York City apartment in September , during which time Ethel typed up his shoddy, hastily scribbled notes. To this point, the government's case against Ethel was largely nonexistent; now, her brother had portrayed her as a willing co-conspirator.

Chief prosecutor Irving H. Saypol leaped all over this account, dramatically telling the jury how she "sat at that typewriter and struck the keys, blow by blow, against her own country in the interests of the Soviets.

Julius and Ethel took the stand in their defense, but other than denying the charges, they largely evoked the Fifth Amendment on matters of espionage and their involvement in the Communist Party, their silence amplifying the testimony against them. Now the most common drug in household medicine cabinets, acetylsalicylic acid was originally made from a chemical found in the bark of willow trees. In its primitive form, the active ingredient, salicin, was used for Sign up now to learn about This Day in History straight from your inbox.

Later known as Real Madrid, the club would become the most successful European football soccer franchise of the 20th century. With its trademark blue-and-white uniforms originally The bill attempted to equalize the number of slave-holding states and free states in the country, allowing Missouri into the Union as a slave state while Even to some at the time, it sounded too good to be true, and in the end, it was.

A British ferry leaving Zeebrugge, Belgium, capsizes, drowning people, on March 6, Shockingly poor safety procedures led directly to this deadly disaster.

Lord Justice Barry Sheen, an investigator of the accident, later said of it, from top to bottom, the body Just one day after the death of long-time Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin, Georgy Malenkov is named premier and first secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.

Members of the Dutch Resistance who were attempting to hijack a truck in Apeldoorn, Holland, ambush Lt. Hanns Rauter, an SS officer. During the following week, the German SS executed Dutch in retaliation.

The Dutch Resistance was one of the fiercest of all the Live TV. This Day In History. The Greenglasses never withdrew their new testimony. On March 29, , the court convicted Julius and Ethel Rosenberg of conspiracy to commit espionage. On April 5, Judge Kaufman sentenced them to death, and sentenced Sobell to 30 years in prison. Some reports claim that the Rosenbergs were offered a plea deal, where admittance of their guilt would grant them a prison sentence.

David Greenglass received a 15 year prison sentence and was released in This request was denied. I believe your conduct in putting into the hands of the Russians the A-bomb years before our best scientists predicted Russia would perfect the bomb has already caused, in my opinion, the Communist aggression in Korea, with the resultant casualties exceeding fifty thousand and who knows how many millions more of innocent people may pay the price of your treason.

Due to Red Scare trials and newspaper headlines, Americans in the s, and s knew that Soviet espionage was serious. It was known that some communists, such as Fuchs, had spied for the Soviets.

Despite these fears, the trial of the Rosenbergs produced mixed reactions among the public. Many Americans who were politically left-wing believed the Rosenbergs were persecuted solely for their past involvement with the Communist Party. Their legal team worked to have the verdict overturned, but their efforts failed. Neither President Truman nor President Eisenhower granted requests to remove the death sentence.

The attorneys appealed to the U. Supreme Court nine times, but the Court never reviewed the record. Edgar Hoover publicly opposed the trial. He believed the execution of Ethel, a young mother, would reflect negatively on both the FBI and the Justice Department. Many commentators of the time argued that the death penalty was used unjustly in the courts as a way to force the Rosenbergs and others to confess to espionage, or to name others involved.

The majority of newspapers at the time in the U. In contrast to the American media, European newspapers did not support the ruling, and there were some protests against it throughout Europe. Despite some public outrage and failed appeals, the Rosenbergs were executed by electric chair at Sing Sing Prison on June 19, They were the only American civilians executed for espionage during the Cold War.

During the s, the U. Venona would also help the government locate spy rings. The Venona project documents were still highly classified at the time of the trial and therefore could not be used as evidence. Many of these decoded messages identified Soviet spies within the Manhattan Project. Theodore Hall is one example. He was a physicist at Los Alamos, and a valuable source to the Soviets.

He escaped prosecution because his involvement was not proven until the Venona documents became unclassified. Some scholars argue that if it would have been possible to use Venona documents in court, both Hall and McNutt would have been revealed as spies and prosecuted, along with Greenglass and Fuchs. The documents were not declassified until Venona documents proved that Julius Rosenberg helped lead a productive ring of Soviet spies. The documents suggest his involvement was with military and industrial espionage, rather than atomic espionage, as previously believed.

Some scholars suggest that the chances of Ethel being executed would have been less likely had Venona documents been unclassified and used in the trial. That same year, Sobell participated in an interview with the New York Times. He stated that he and Julius passed military and industrial information to the Soviet Union, hoping it would help them defeat the Nazis in World War II. There are some conflicting assessments among historians regarding the outcome of the Rosenberg trial.

Walter Schneir, in Final Verdict , argues that evidence against Ethel was fabricated by the Greenglasses. He also explains that Rosenberg was fired from the Army Corps of Engineers in January of , and that KGB files state his espionage activities ended by , so the meeting David Greenglass mentioned could never have occurred.

Schneir argues that Ruth worked alone and met with a Soviet agent to deliver a sketch of a bomb, which was placed in a KGB file center on December 27, His research relies heavily on newly released KGB files.

Others argue that Julius and Ethel were guilty, with Ethel playing a minor role, but that their trial and sentence were unjust due to the lack of evidence. In , five historians concluded that Soviet documents show Ethel was actively involved and attended meetings with Julius and his sources, but that there is no evidence to suggest she typed specific notes.

He does, however, believe that the prosecutors worked to guarantee a conviction and abused the legal system.