What is the difference between medal of honor and battlefield

As you may recall EA used to be a very pushy beast when it came to acquisitions, and studios that entered its cavernous maw didn't always survive and thrive the way BioWare did, for example. As a franchise Call of Duty went on to stomp all over Medal of Honor, which wasn't really bad but couldn't compete with what Infinity Ward and chums were brewing up over at Activision.

Now here we are in with Call of Duty one of the most dominant brands in gaming, and after several years of being the runner-up, Battlefield 1 is getting terrific reviews and looking like it might be a real challenger to Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare when it launches in November. It's interesting, isn't it? Particularly fascinating is that Zampella and many of the core Infinity Ward team actually went back to EA to form Respawn when things went sour with Activision, a story that seems to be murkier than the anti-Activision crowd would have you believe.

Funny how the good guys and bad guys change. It's almost like all this drama is a lot more human and complex than our simple headline narratives can capture. Battlefield players really want the classic scoreboard back.

Battlefield is not technically out yet in much of the world, but those who have been playing are already sick of the new scoreboard. Battlefield bugs - all the known issues and their fixes. If you're getting ready to pick up Battlefield , best look out for these known bugs. The Xbox App will finally let you install games anywhere and access their folders.

For the most part, these three feel every bit their 20, 19, and 17 years. Battlefield, on the other hand, has always been a more arcadey game, with the main emphasis being on vehicles. Similar themes, totally different gameplay. For any whom this post happens to offend, I can get you a great deal on a spine. User Info: Chilly Get your facts straight. User Info: specialkid8. I was always under the impression that the battlefield games weren't arcadey. User Info: snoognz BF was arcadey but the Bad Company series is more realistic but in an over the top way.

Assumption is the mother of all stuff ups. User Info: sidstarter. Ignore all other posters, they don't have a clue. Battlefield is a sandbox game. It is indeed an arcade shooter but it has elements that set it apart from CoD. There is freedom to tackle objectives anyway you want, vehicles, destructibility, and a slightly slower pace. It tries to be more realistic and hardcore than other shooters and it is to a point, though ultimately the experience is still very arcadish.

MoH has never been about authenticity. From past experience, i believe they are games meant for cinematic and good story telling value. The gameplay is similar to arcade shooters though with a twist on controller layout and the addition of a lean feature for a slightly more tactical feel. Most MoH games were pretty linear, although Airborne had mini sandboxes, which was great.

I think this one is going back to the linear feel, but faster pacing and more explosions. Also, there weren't any elite nazi unites with huge miniguns and gasmaks. All of that was part of the great cinematic feel and story. The bread is delicious! User Info: raven Trying to destroy mortar positions from a chopper with hellfires, but the text always says out of range? Side Quest 5 Answers Offline Multiplayer? General 1 Answer How do you climb up walls and mountains?

Side Quest 1 Answer How do I secure the warehouse in the graveyard? Main Quest 2 Answers. Ask A Question. Browse More Questions.

Keep me logged in on this device. Forgot your username or password? User Info: Austin3l6 Austin3l6 11 years ago 1 I'm a bit confused, can someone tell me why EA is putting out 2 modern warfare games? What are the main differences?