Why 44 1khz

There is now no difference between down-sampling 48 kHz or Choosing the sample rate for your audio depends on several factors. For the typical producer, band, or solo artist, a However, it also increases the demands on your computer and the risk of Pro Tools crashing on an older computer.

Besides the sample rate, you also need to consider the bit depth for your audio. A higher bit depth offers more dynamic range. In most cases, it is best to stick with bit audio. It is becoming the standard and is used by most modern formats. With sample rates, you can down-sample to convert to a lower sample rate. With the bit depth, you can truncate the audio or use dithering. Truncation can create distortion while dithering allows you to create bit audio from bit tracks without any noticeable loss.

In the end, However, if your audio is to be used in a video or delivered on a digital format, 48 kHz and its derivatives may provide the better option.

Hey James CD market is still huge. Country music CD sales has not changed. CDs are stating to come back to where sales were previously. Record labels require delivery at 96k 24bit. It is my understanding that an increased bit depth will increase the overhead but an increased sample rate will do no such thing.

The increased bit depth increases the available dynamic range but an increased sample rate I have a good system and my wife swears that vinyl sounds way better than anything else. Whilst theory dictates… my ears can hear the difference this time and not just by a small amount. They can actually introduce unintended distortion in the audible spectrum, and this is something that can be heard in listening tests.

Testing raw loopback recording on a song close to -0dBFS in Audacity from I had to test this out myself to actually see the theory in action. Are you one those music artists, who would want to know whether to record in The answer to this question is simple. It's as simple as that. But wait, you ought to learn more about the facts related to this process as they can affect the cost of producing your music. The difference in frequency is too small for the human ear to detect, which is obvious when you consider that a second is such a short amount of time.

The only reason you should use for differentiating them is therefore the intended purpose of your recording, CD or DVD. Do you want to create your own music? Do you have what it takes to be a singer? Watch this video below to see how it goes into the specifics of the differences and relative positives and negatives of recording in either A sampling rate is also known as a sampling frequency, and as the term implies it indicates the mean number of samples obtained within a second.

Put more simply, the number of Hertz Hz is the number of measurements that your recording hardware makes every second. A higher frequency is a higher recording quality. A kilohertz kHz is the same as one thousand samples per second. Are you ready to record your written song? Check out this video that nicely helps to explain what a sampling rate actually is and how you can use it to your advantage when recording music.

In audio sampling, there can be a digital-to-analog conversion DAC or the analog-to-digital conversion ADC , which can be used to store and transmit the audios. Are you prepared to get your songs recorded? For people who are not well acquainted with the technical aspects of music production, they would not know whether it's A trained person will also struggle to notice the difference in sampling rate, due to the difference being so slight.

If you are not sure of other rates, then you may want to try recording your live performances at Through this method, you can choose which among the two would be able to reproduce your music sounds the way you want them to sound. If you have plans of converting, you may want to use This is because at The accepted rule of thumb in the recording industry is that you should record at twice the frequency rate of the frequencies that you want to capture.

Converting to 8. Want to become a successful recording-artist? There were a few artists who have recommended recording at And then downsizing using Apparently, the process had successful results for them.

Nevertheless upsizing from This is one advantage of 48kHz over the To experts, they can notice the minor degradation of the sound when using However, to ordinary listeners, the difference can be imperceptible.

However, if 48 kHz has a larger file size, this can be to the detriment of some listeners who have limited space on their devices, or people who are streaming and must therefore download more data. Similarly, the slight difference in file size, when added up, for example, over a complete CD, can make a big difference and could be the difference between having an extra track on your CD or not. Of course, these are all experiences of users and there are no extensive studies to prove these claims.

But, you can learn from them anyhow. You can use these experiences as bases for your own experiments. You will have to do your own experiments and observe what works best for you.

The best thing to do is to try out both frequencies, record at both Then at the time, there existed a product in the late s called the Sony F1 that was designed to record digital audio onto readily-available video tape Betamax, not VHS. That was at So this would make it easy to transfer recordings, without resampling and interpolation, from the F1 to CD or in the other direction.

I'm not entirely sure, but I believe what that means is that you can have three stereo sample pairs per horizontal line, and for every 5 lines, where you would normally have 15 samples, there are 14 samples plus one additional sample for some parity check or redundancy in the F1. Now, since color TV was introduced, they had to bump down slightly the horizontal line rate to lines per second. That adjustment leads to the 44, samples per second in the Sony F1. You should use sampling rate more than 40 kHz because of anti-aliasing filters.

You should have some reserve in frequency to prevent signal distortion due to filter's reponse slope. The actual value of They used this rate widely for that moment.

In the transition to digital formats, audio were stored in a pseudo-video waveform that could be seen as either black or white representing the binary format. The field rate and structure used by the television standard is as follows for 60 Hz video: lines per field excluded the first 35 blanked lines.

This convention were later used for the CD format, due to equipment compatibility concerns the very first equipment used to produce CD masters used for CD replication was video based. Source: The Art of Sound Reproduction, p. Since human hearing range is roughly 20 Hz to 20, Hz, the sampling rate had to be greater than 40 kHz. In addition, signals must be low-pass filtered before sampling to avoid aliasing. While an ideal low-pass filter would perfectly pass frequencies below 20 kHz without attenuating them and perfectly cut off frequencies above 20 kHz, such an ideal filter is theoretically impossible it is noncausal , so in practice a transition band is necessary, where frequencies are partly attenuated.

The wider this transition band is, the easier and more economical it is to make an anti-aliasing filter. The It seems the hearinig limit for humans might be much higher than 20kHz if looked at from "dynamic" time resolution perspective rather than typical static sinusoidal waves.

Also interesting comments about the margin between 20kHz and 22 kHz for reconstruction filtering. Actually there's been quie interesting work from Peter Craven on time-domain optimized filtering which argues for at least 96kHz for hi-fi playback. A theorem called the Nyquist sampling theorem states that in order to sample a signal of X Hz without significant loss of quality, you need to sample at 2X the frequency. The limit of human hearing is approximately 20kHz, which hence requires a sample rate of approximately 40Khz.

This is why CDs are sampled at 44Khz.