What is the difference between nec and fidic

In contrast to the adversarial contracts of the past, both FIDIC and NEC contracts promote proactive collaboration and protect the parties involved, thus helping to avoid lengthy and costly disputes. Both are used to outline time, quality, and cost obligations associated with a project. Both are also adaptable when necessary. Using plain English, free from confusing legal terms makes these contracts user-friendly and easy to understand..

They promote effective project management and enable collaboration between parties, as well as minimise chances of formal disputes occurance. Designed to manage a wide variety of AECO projects from start to finish and avoid costly disputes, NEC contracts protect the interests of both the client and contractor, which also makes them a favourable option. Clients often opt for NEC contracts because they ensure a level of certainty in regard to the outcome of the project.

Additionally, NEC contracts take a proactive and preventative approach to contract management, outlining an early warning system for how to proceed if an unexpected error or event that may affect project quality, cost or time occurs.

Within this context, detailed programmes are submitted to the Project Manager regularly, reducing the risk of potential problems by making it easier to detect potential issues early. NEC contracts are endorsed by a number of industry and international bodies thanks to a strong track-record aiding in the success of large-scale projects. They can be applied to almost any project and have been tested and refined over sixty years.

Thanks to their wide recognition by many international bodies and jurisdictions, these contracts provide a globally accepted foundation that makes it easier to work across borders. One benefit of using FIDIC contracts is a variety of options in risks allocation, which is determined by a form selected from the suite..

This is particularly helpful in mega-projects with multiple parties and stakeholders. FIDIC have included a new early warning clause 8. Under the NEC4 scheme, for clarity the risk register has been renamed as the early warning register, and under clause 16 9 the Project Manager prepares a first early warning register within one week of the starting date.

Regular early warning meetings are then to be held, beginning within two weeks of the starting date. The NEC approach is drafted to encourage the identification of problems and for the parties to work together in order to establish an early resolution. This provides that a Contractor will only be compensated on the basis that an early warning had been given, based upon the date on which an experienced Contractor would have or ought to have recognised the need to give a warning.

Contractors are therefore encouraged to play their part in the early warning procedures, in order to avoid inadequate cost recovery for those problems which materialise later on. FIDIC is not so obviously prescriptive, but there is no reason why similar arguments cannot be raised. FIDIC have made it clear that a notice given under the new contract must clearly state that it is a notice and make reference to the sub-clause under which it is issued.

The NEC3 form already did this. This is to try and reduce disputes about what is a notice where parties try and argue that references in a programme or progress report actually constitute notice of a claim. There is an obvious benefit in defining a notice as being one that needs to be identified as a notice and including the sub-clause.

However, it is equally true that this is not the type of provision that is strictly followed. A failure to identify notices will then mean that there will be arguments about whether a particular notice is a notice or not. Any such arguments will not simply be answered by the new FIDIC definition, as local law, and the factual matrix surrounding the event may well still come into play.

Indeed, as we have explained in our article on page 30 of this Review, the new sub-clause This is in line with the NEC approach and is clearly potentially a good thing, and fully in keeping with current contract trends. It is sensible to encourage the notification and early review of issues relating to extensions of time and the financial impact of change in delay as the work progresses. There should be benefits for everyone. For the Employer, they will be better informed about the moving contract price and likely completion date.

In theory, the Contractor should then also obtain better cash flow. However, the proposed notice and claims procedures will undoubtedly place an increased burden on both the Employer and Contractor to follow these new administrative requirements. Both provide for adjudication as a mandatory precondition to arbitration. The NEC4 has introduced a new option of referral to senior representatives of the parties to the project.

The idea is to provide for a four-week period for negotiation to see whether a more formal dispute can be avoided. This does not and in the UK could not affect the statutory right to refer a matter to adjudication at any time.

The DAB will be encouraged to make site visits and so become familiar with the project at a time when there are no disputes.

It will also be able to provide assistance and non-binding recommendations when disputes do arise. Back to the previous page Next article.

We regularly produce newsletters, articles and papers to keep our clients and other stakeholders up to date with the latest developments and debates in construction and energy law. You can browse some of our most recent materials Here, or sign up to our monthly publications below to receive them directly to your inbox.

Sign up. Both contracts are widely used internationally in both civil and common law jurisdictions. For each contract, the governing law should be specified and the ruling language. NEC focuses on issuing early warnings, on programme and on preventive measures to make the contract more manageable between the parties.

NEC uses easy, clear, and straightforward language. In FIDIC, the Contractor should submit a detailed programme that is only updated when the actual work does not match what is planned anymore. While in NEC, the Contractor should submit to the Project Manager, on a regular basis, a detailed programme for acceptance.

Both Contractor and Project Manager should notify the other when any unexpected event or error happens that can affect time, cost and the quality of the Works. This enables both Contractor and Project Manager to detect the problem as soon as possible and hence reduce the risks associated with it. In contrast, in FIDIC contracts, Contractors will only claim for their time and money losses when the problem had already occurred.

These documents show the quality requirements of work, required workmanship, plant, and materials.