Why looper doesn make sense

Tracking devices in corpses? So does changing the past matter or not? Fuck if I can tell. The only answer is: when it suits the writer. Could it have been done? Did Rian Johnson do it? Now, you can argue that Looper was a lot of fun and smart for a sci-fi film and that you love it. I have no problem with any of those statements. It certainly was smarter than Transformers 3 or Skyline. I want to watch films like Children of Men.

I want to watch films like District 9. I want films to make more sense the more I think about them, so I can watch them over and over and cherish them. I want them to give me ideas, crazy ideas, that make my brain expand and explode. And I wont. I did. Please god. I am ready for it to end. I really liked a lot of what Looper had to offer, particularly in the first half.

I wish these sorts of ideas about identity had been explored a bit more rather than just brushed upon, but oh well. Time travel is always a brain-twister, and at the end of the day I think Looper at least took our minds to some interesting places.

What do you guys think? Did I miss something, or get something wrong? Looper is the kind of film that gets people talking, which is one of the things I like most about movies in the first place! You could still have somebody in the past incinerate the bodies and erase all trace of them ever existing.

And why make it a rule that they have to be killed by their younger selves, who are more likely to crack? Obviously this would not have made for as good a story, but it certainly makes the mob seem a little stupid. And can the mob create the exit point for all the portals, since we know they can transport from future Shanghai all the way to Kansas?

Why not just have the exit point be feet in the air or feet under water and let the laws of nature do the dirty work? He clears out an entire subsection of the mob, and the mob has 30 years to piece together what happened.

And that communication stops without explanation at such and such date. If nothing else, when the victims stop getting whacked because the entire Looper population of Kansas is wiped out, it would send a pretty telling signal to the future that something went wrong 30 years previously. One of the last scenes is Sara happening upon the silver stolen by Old Joe.

Well, that silver really should have vanished along with Old Joe. He never came back. Joe killed himself before he could grow old and be sent back. That silver is still with Abe, who by all rights should still be alive and wondering where the hell Joe has run off to. The entire movie never happened. If Joe kills himself while young, he never grows old. If he never grows old, he never gets sent back. If he never gets sent back, he never tries to kill The Rainmaker.

If he never tries to kill The Rainmaker, he never kills himself. The entire remainder of the movie is a paradox. It should never happen, because none of it happened. That would be a plausible excuse for a time travel movie. The audience could set aside its uneasiness about a third scientifically impossible thing telekinesis and time travel except for one problem.

Joe carves a message into his arm, and it shows up on Old Joe. That shows that the present and the future are linked. Things can change in the present, but it will affect the future. The future is THE future, not A future. Rian Johnson mentions alternate dimensions in an interview with Yahoo! Given the nature of time travel as depicted in this movie, the only thing that COULD have happened the minute he pulled the trigger is: Joe wakes up the morning he would have received the notice to kill what would turn out to be his future self but instead never receives the notice.

And even that is a stretch, as it would imply a future event can affect a past event. None of these are good options. Really, the entire plot would need a massive overhaul to come up with a fourth solution. Joseph Gordon-Levitt is fantastic at his understated mimicry, Bruce Willis is great at being Bruce Willis, and the movie deftly introduces tiny sci-fi elements like the Blunderbuss and the Gat.

One especially memorable scene is where Old Joe describes how his memory works. That is great science fiction writing, because it passes the smell test and is completely original. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam.

Learn how your comment data is processed. Then there no risk of said person causing paradox. And killing her and getting rid of her body is not presented as overly troublesome for the bad guys. They just burn her body and move on………well then ….. Listed here is often a remarkable Blog site You might Acquire effective that we Promote You to observe….

Was another timeline created here or was he not even injured? Superpowers indeed. Does he say it just because he likes to mutter? Why such disparity? Point 5 Sara working the farm alone is not implied. She is simply there on the farm alone at the time. Point 9 The silver was from the present, not from the future so it could remain there. No matter if someone from the future or present moved it there. Point 10 In my opinion the story is a single time line, not alternate dimensions.

Then going through his life he had NEW knowledge of his fate. IMHO the most glaring issue wash Joe shooting himself. Johnson said this was one of several things he worked out in his head but didn't put in the movie because it felt superfluous to the story.

He instead explained it to us. So they can't kill people in the future. But if they send them back, that is not triggered.

Knowing a looper killed his mother, is the Rainmaker closing all these loops for revenge? It's a good question. This is another one of those questions Johnson had answered in his head but didn't put in the movie.

In fact, he even conceived a scene with Abe addressing it but never shot it. So they're trying to keep it as tight as possible. So the initial reason they set it up this way was to keep the causality loop as tight as possible," Johnson said.

Because, for example, if someone else kills your older self and you have to exist with your own murderer for 30 years, what's stopping you for murdering them or doing something to screw everything else up?

Was Joe in love with Sarah and was this something explored more in different versions of the script? Johnson said he explicitly didn't want Joe and Sarah to fall in love because Joe's decision at the end has to be because he sees himself in Cid, not out of love for Sarah. Instead, their love scene is just "two lonely people in an intense situation together.

Yes, if you want to think of it that way.