Ameba Ownd

アプリで簡単、無料ホームページ作成

podelana1975's Ownd

How old is mountain ararat

2022.01.07 19:29




















This was down to 7 km2 in The ice cap supports 11 outlet glaciers. A number of these glaciers are debris covered at lower elevations. There are estimates of Pleistocene coverage down to 3, m asl which would have covered some km2 of the volcano. Investigators have not found evidence of glacial deposits low enough on the flanks to support this suggestion. Overhead image of entire Ararat massif.


Shows lava flows to the north. Evidence of a partial flank collapse to the SE. Also visible are satellite pyroclastic cones. The Turkish government has not been particularly helpful agreeing to requests to scientifically research Ararat and its surrounding area. As a result, this volcano is not as well studied as perhaps it should be.


Volcanic threats should include flank collapses, debris avalanches, pyroclastic flows and lahars. The region is an active earthquake fault and a large earthquake was connected to the last eruption.


I — center of eruption. II — deposits of the post-eruption landslide of eruption. III — St. IV — old village of Akory. V — current location of Akory.


VI — additional deposits of landslide. VII — deposits of earlier landslides. The eruption was classed as a VEI 3. It has variously been described as initially phreatic in nature finishing as it laid down a pyroclastic deposit on the upper northern flank.


It was also accompanied with a 7. Several large villages were destroyed during the event which killed up to 10, people. The earthquake created a 74 km long fracture from the summit. A debris flow reportedly reached a village. There are a pair of unconfirmed eruptions in and The next eruption is dated at BC. The last two eruptions are described as confirmed, as pyroclastic deposits buried both people and their tools. This is the oddest thing I came across doing this post.


Photoshopped eruption of Ararat. Have no idea where this comes from or why. It showed up in several searches. There are no known photos of Ararat in eruption that I have been able to find. One of the oddities I came across putting this together are what appear to be photoshopped color photos of Mount Ararat Eruption. They do not look old enough to capture the eruption.


Schematic of general tectonics of Turkey and the Anatolian Plate. Turkey is a complex tectonic region. The western two thirds of the nation is on top of the Anatolian Plate, being forced westward by the collision of the Arabian and the Eurasian Plates. The far western edge of the plate is a subduction zone called the Hellenic Arc west of southern Greece and south of Crete in southern Agean Sea. Motion along the Anatolian Plate in Turkey is bound by a pair of strike-slip faults.


The motion is similar to squeezing watermelon or gourd seed between your fingers. Motion of this impact was initially subduction but shifted as the continental blocks impacted one another. The northern portion of the Arabian Plate separated after subducting and the region no longer behaves as a subduction zone.


Schematic of tectonic blocks and fault lines in Turkey. As the collision continues, the region east and south of the intersection of the North Anatolian and East Anatolian Faults north of Diyarbakir is a complex grouping of what appear to be crustal blocks, fault lines and suture lines. There is a small block south of Van. There is a larger structure to the NE of the Van Block that may not be a block at all but the western portion of the Iran Plate.


There is a line of relatively recent volcanoes defining what may be another area of structural weakness. Four of these volcanoes stretch along the northern shore of Lake Van Van Golu. Its last eruption was AD. Next is Suphan Dag, a complex of domes, pyroclastic cones and maars last active some 10, years ago.


Girekol is a stratovolcano center last active in the Holocene. Final volcano along this line is Tendurek Dag, a stratovolcano last active in Volcanoes of eastern Turkey and Armenia. Red triangles are volcanoes.


Ararat is the fifth volcano along that line. Kars volcano is to the north of the line. Three Armenian volcanoes are located. There is a single volcano north of this line called the Kars volcano. It was last active sometime in the Holocene. Armenia also hosts at least five volcanoes. These are generally east of Ararat.


Most are stratovolcanoes. There are pyroclastic cones, large basaltic flows and other examples of recent volcanic activity. Most recent eruption in Armenia was AD. Most of the rest of the activity is 5, years ago or older. Its slopes are covered year-round with snow and glaciers beginning at the meter mark, while its caves, which were used as homes by some of the early Anatolian Christians, are located at approximately meters.


Visitors can still see images of crosses and other religious symbols on the cave walls. Small Ararat is located to the east of Big Ararat. There is little vegetation on its slopes due to a thick layer of ash, lava and tephra deposits. Nearby is a national park covering more than 88 thousand hectares, where researchers are still trying to find the remains of Noah's Ark.


Mount Ararat itself remains a popular trekking destination in Turkey. Mount Ararat is known and recognized around the world, yet few people are aware of the origins of its name. Biblical Hebrew, Assyrian and Babylonian texts all provide insights into its meaning.


In the Bible, Mount Ararat was first referenced in the 7th century as the place where Noah's Ark came to rest after the Flood. Mount Ararat has always been one of the main symbols of Armenia, for historically it was located on the territory of the Armenian Highlands.


They returned to the site with a film crew in October Many Christians believe the mountain in Turkey is the final resting place of Noah's ark, which the Bible says protected Noah, his family, and pairs of every animal species on Earth during a divine deluge that wiped out most of humanity.


The team says radiocarbon-dated wood taken from the discovery site—whose location they're keeping secret for now—shows the purported ark is about 4, years old, which coincides roughly with the time of Noah's flood implied by the Bible. Skepticism of the new Noah's ark claim extends to at least one scholar who interprets the Bible literally. As a creationist, Wood believes God created Earth and its various life-forms out of nothing roughly 6, years ago. Radiocarbon dating estimates the ages of organic objects by measuring the radioisotope carbon 14, which is known to decay at a set rate over time.


The method is generally thought to reach its limit with objects about 60, years old. Earth is generally thought to be about four and a half billion years old. Across the board, radiocarbon dates need to be recalibrated, Wood believes, to reflect shorter time frames. Given this perceived overestimation in radiocarbon dating, the wood the Noah's Ark Ministries International team found should have a "traditional" radiocarbon date of several tens of thousands of years if the wood is truly 4, years old, Wood said.


The wood date is "way, way, way too young. Wood thinks Noah's ark will never be found, because "it would have been prime timber after the flood," he said. You've got a huge boat made of wood, so let's use that," he said. Related: National Geographic's search for Noah's flood.


Another reason scholars are skeptical of the latest Noah's ark discovery claim is that Genesis—the first book of the Bible—never specifies which peak the vessel supposedly landed on in Turkey. Stony Brook's Zimansky agreed. The Noah's Ark Ministries International explorers are "playing in a very different ballpark than the rest of us," Zimansky said. Even if the Noah's Ark Ministries International team did find a wooden structure or even a boat on Mount Ararat, there are other explanations for what the structure might be.


For example, it could be a shrine constructed by early Christians to commemorate the site where they believed Noah's Ark should be, Zimansky said. Even in that speculative case, it wouldn't be 4, years old. Bible scholar Sasson said he thinks biblical writers intended the story of Noah's ark to be allegorical, not a true recounting of historical events.