What is the difference between a catholic and a river that runs uphill

Oh yeah! That blackening was normal for British towns and cities until the Clean Air Act of , and from then until they were cleaned up.

It was more noticeable on the eastern side of cities, due to the prevailing westerly, and most noticeable all on railway bridges, due to the smoke from steam locomotives.

When a town or city centre was cleaned up, it was often done in a coordinated manner something to do with funding, I guess , and the effect was very dramatic. I've seen before and after photos in Glasgow, and it was a remarkable change. My wife thinks those kinds of buildings in Glasgow are called "terraced apartments", but I don't remember that. I was sitting down Two nuns driving down the street.

A demon appears from nowhere and leaps onto the bonnet making lascivious gestures. The novice nun freaks. The mother superior says "Calm. Just show him your cross. Two nuns riding their bicycles down an unfamiliar cobblestone road. First nun says, "I don't think I've come this way before. That sounds like a conflation. For one thing, "apartments" isn't much used here, unless someone's trying to be fancy. We calls 'em "flats".

For another, "terraced" refers to a layout of houses - I've never heard of a "terraced flat". L and I talked about this once, but I can't remember the US term she identified for our "terrace", but I do remember she wasn't familiar with our term.

Townhouse or Row-house, with vaguely regional preferences. I think row-house is fading fast in favour of townhouse. What does a continuous block of houses have to do with terraces? Again, there are regional differences here. In Western Canada, that's a duplex. In Toronto, a duplex I think refers to a vertically split building and a side-by-side is a semi. Vertically split buildings in BC are rare, though I owned one and called it a tri-plex.

There are also ownership issues. In BC, at least till recently, both halves of a duplex were generally owned by one owner, who rented out one or both of them. Back east, the two sides are generally owned by two people. Thus you see major differences between the two sides in maintenance quality, trim type and presence, even paint colour and roof material. This is common in the east and looks absurd to someone who grew up in BC.

Townhouses seem to be almost always "strata title". The exterior of the building and most of the common space belongs to an association that taxes the residents for upkeep. I've only seen one or two townhouses where the individual units were separately owned. Greg Goss, I looked, and yep -- the big cat had moved from the grocery bag to the back of the closet.

I turned away only to spin back as cat 2 erupted from the closet, having been hidden more or less underneath the other. Okay, that was cute. Cat 3 was in front of the water dish asking for more, so I filled it, and as I set it down cat 4 wiggled out of the other corner of the closet.

It was a real clown car moment, with fur instead of polka dots. They're in rows, usually parallel, like terraces. Some habits have windscreens.

It comes from terraced garden design, where a raised flat platform usually overlooks a view. Townhouse has become rather down market usage in this part of the world, now they are called "garden homes", I've no idea why. Not really, duplex is generally an older term for a semi-detached, although I seldom hear it today, when I do it seems to be a more general term, for a building with two separate living spaces rather than both parts of a symmetrical semi-.

Not in Ontario, separately owned rowhouses are in the majority, although strata title properties seem to be gaining in popularity. When we were looking to buy a place in Toronto in , most of the townhouses we looked at seriously were strata.

It might be that our realtor was matching our search to what we were expecting, but I doubt that particular realtor could be that bright. We ended up at a huge unit strata with both stacked townhomes and tower apartments together in one strata association. It may have been some issue with our price point, or it might be something with the particular "shell" position around Toronto where we could afford. Most of the ones we looked at were near Young and Steele, near and Don Valley, near Jane and Fitch not nearly as bad as the media makes it, and TRES affordable because of the media attention.

We ended up buying at the edge of the city where Bloor meets edge of the city between Toronto and Mississauga. Friday Humo u r. John Dean. Reply to author. Report message as abuse. Show original message. Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message.

So this guy goes to the Doctor and says "I'm having trouble with my hearing" and the Doc asks him "Can you describe the symptoms? Les Albert. Archie Goodwin is having a conversation with a young woman. He asks her, "What's the difference between a Catholic and a river that runs uphill? Decades later,. N Jill Marsh. On Fri, 29 May , "Jim Beaver".

John Hatpin. Les Albert wrote:. However, many liquids that do not have strong cohesive bonds still work in siphons, so it's unclear exactly how siphons work in different cases, according to Wonderopolis. What about the paper towel example? This action, called capillary action, allows small volumes of water to flow uphill, against gravity, so long as the water flows through narrow and small spaces. This upward flow happens when a liquid's adhesion to the walls of a material, such as the paper towel, is stronger than the cohesive forces between its liquid molecules, according to the U.

Geological Survey. In plants, water molecules are drawn up capillaries called the xylem, helping the plant to draw in water from the soil, the USGS said. Beneath the continent's ice sit the Gamburtsev Mountains, a massive range with peaks and valleys that are about the same size as the European Alps, she said. Intriguingly, researchers can tell that the river is flowing backward because the ice on top of it is aligned against the direction of the ice flow, Live Science reported previously.

This alignment and the enormous pressure from the ice sheet above it push the water uphill, Bell said. There are other instances in which water has naturally run uphill. For example, an 8. In addition, a study in the journal Physical Review Letters showed that small amounts of water put on a hot surface — a scalding pan, for instance — can "climb" tiny stairs made out of vapor if the water is hot enough, Live Science reported.

Finally, we had a way to evaluate the elevation and slope of the ancient bedrock terraces. Scientific research is often collaborative, requiring multiple voices to provide a breadth of insight, experience, ideas, and skillsets. Posing and answering the question of whether the Lower Wisconsin River valley was carved by an eastward- or westward-flowing river was no exception.

We began by taking a series of hydraulic core samples along the terrace, driving hollow steel rods down through the surface sediment to the bedrock terrace and describing the cores we collected to identify the depth at which we struck bedrock. We combined the LiDAR data, coring information, and core descriptions to precisely identify the elevation of the river-scoured bedrock terrace to within a few centimeters at a handful of points. Then we collected this information again and again at dozens of points along the valley to build enough data to identify the trend.

Those several weeks of data collection stand out in my memory. The anticipation of answering the east-versus-west question lent a tension to the fieldwork that I had never experienced in all my years of research. Within the first few days, I began to develop a broad sense of how deeply we should core at a given location depending on whether the bedrock terrace dipped to the east or to the west.

The implications were tantalizing: A different configuration for the Lower Wisconsin River necessitates a different one for the upper Mississippi River, and for tributaries of the upper Mississippi River—the Black, Chippewa, Root, St.

Croix, and Minnesota. If this were true, it would prompt a reconsideration of the way we understand rivers across the North American continent.

While I am by nature an early riser, I recall numerous sleepless nights in the summer of , thinking about the emerging work and waiting for the alarm to sound for another day of coring. I would hope and, sometimes, even despair over the depth to which the core was penetrating, and obsess over the location and placement of new cores.

My anxiety turned to excitement when I began to be able to predict the depth at which the core would strike bedrock if the terrace were indeed dipping to the east.

The data all pointed to a valley that, while occupied today by a westward-flowing river, was actually carved by an ancient, eastward-flowing river. The months that followed were filled with marshaling additional evidence to support this new interpretation of the river. We pored over the data to look for holes or flaws in the interpretations and presented our results to colleagues in the field for their critical assessment of the work.

Given our findings, my colleagues and I have developed a picture of a vast ancient river system that drained almost all of what is now Wisconsin and Minnesota. We have named it the ancestral Wyalusing River. The course of the Wyalusing River was certainly controlled by the local bedrock. Erosion-resistant layers of dolomite bedrock form topographic highs in the state. The east-west running Military Ridge in the southwest corner of Wisconsin, which is capped by one of these layers of dolomite, prevented these ancient rivers from flowing to the south.

Instead, they flowed to the east. Fed by glaciers of an earlier era, these swift rivers cut deeply into the weakly cemented and easily erodible sandstone that underlies the dolomite and moved into the Great Lakes lowland and eventually to the Gulf of St. Lawrence and the North Atlantic Ocean. Perhaps a million or more years ago, encroaching glaciers blocked the Wyalusing River and dammed a vast lake in the river valley. The rising waters spilled over the dolomite ridge to carve a pathway to the south, flowing into a new valley between Prairie du Chien and Dubuque, Iowa, and continuing to the Gulf of Mexico.

The new, shorter pathway to the oceans captured the rivers across Wisconsin and Minnesota and formed the upper Mississippi River system we know today. Glaciers caused the reorganization of these river systems, but the lack of glaciation in the Driftless Area left scattered fragments of ancient river valleys exposed at the surface rather than buried by glacial sediment.

This was the window into the geologic past that allowed us to understand the legacy of the ancient rivers of Wisconsin and Minnesota.