How many affairs did clinton have

In their sudden and exclusive reverence for the law, feminists have jeopardized some of their greatest achievements. He is pro-choice; he signed into law the Family and Medical Leave Act, which had been vetoed twice by a Republican president; he favors affirmative action, which benefits women more than any ethnic group in the country; he has made child care a policy priority this year.

According to the Center for the American Woman and Politics, Clinton has appointed 10 of the 21 women who have served in Cabinet-level positions, including the first woman ever to be secretary of state or attorney general. Anita Perez Ferguson, who is now president of the caucus, formerly worked in the Clinton administration, as a White House liaison for the Transportation Department, and at the Democratic National Committee.

Just because she is friends with Hillary. To this day, they remain angry at him for signing into law the radical welfare revisions of , which overwhelmingly affect poor women.

But with that exception, there has been a sea change in their attitudes toward him. For one thing, after the congressional elections of , they saw him as all they had standing between them and Newt Gingrich. Yet today Clinton is accused of traducing every boundary we have uneasily set around sex in the workplace, and Americans—especially American women—reply with a yawn.

And Bill Clinton is allowed to have this year-old servicing him, with blow jobs or whatever, and women support him overwhelmingly? And in some sense Bill Clinton is fulfilling a sort of secret fantasy of a lot of American women, of this kind of old-fashioned, virile man. It is still possible that women will turn against Clinton.

Memo to pollsters: Keep your eye on soccer moms, who may eventually tire of trying to explain oral sex to their nine-year-olds. But Roiphe is onto something —a shift in elite opinion about both Clinton and sexual mores.

The resulting exchange, published by the Observer in the February 9 issue, was galactically strange. It was the most embarrassing thing I had read in a long time. Forget the dog-in-the-manger, down-in-the-mouth neo-puritanism of the op-ed tumbrel drivers, and see him instead as his guests do: a man in a dinner jacket with more heat than any star in the room. This is precisely the sort of retro whipped cream that feminists are supposed to be able to see through; once upon a time, they construed it as their job to help the rest of us do the same.

As has been noted elsewhere, class dynamics, almost as much as politics, drove the differing reactions to Anita Hill and Paula Jones. Hill was a well-spoken, Yale-educated lawyer; Jones was of the lower middle class. But when they decided, for other reasons, to keep their distance from her, her Ozark roots made her an easy woman to ignore.

Other factors may have made her more credible than Paula Jones—her reluctance to come forward, for example. But it was surely not a coincidence that some feminists saw the light only when confronted with a gorgeous, mature woman whose voice, clothes, makeup, and manner all gave off the vibes of the upper-middle-class suburbanite.

But in status terms—the terms that matter in the East Coast elites—she is irretrievably tacky, a creature from an Aaron Spelling show. Clearly this is a bunch of Wellesley girls saying that Wellesley girls and Yale graduates are worth fighting for, and high-school grads and hairdressers and lounge singers can be destroyed.

In easing past the contradictions of the feminist class system, Hillary Clinton is the crucial figure. But less appreciated is a second, more subtle way in which Hillary has shielded her husband.

She is, in effect, his feminist beard: the symbolic guarantor of his political bona fides. He may hit on women like Gennifer Flowers and Paula Jones, her presence says, but when it came to sharing a home and a presidency , he chose a woman like me. Again and again, feminists cite the Hillary factor as mitigating evidence. We were supposed to be doing away with the Madonna and the whore—or at least trying to integrate them.

You know, his tone said, that crazy woman, that fantasist, that lying home wrecker. Far from protesting, many feminists have piled on. At the end of the Observer gathering, Erica Jong congratulated herself and her companions on their sisterly solidarity.

If feminists had stopped to think of Lewinsky as a real person, it might have slowed them down. And I think that the power differentials there are something that I couldn't ever fathom consequences at 22 that I understand obviously so differently at Renewed attention is being paid to the affair that Lewinsky, then a White House intern, had with Clinton, with the twists and turns of the scandal being dramatized in " Impeachment: American Crime Story ," a new FX series for which Lewinsky is a producer.

She told Tapper Tuesday that "we're seeing aspects of Bill that we haven't seen before. The former President has reflected about his relationship with Lewinsky over the years, including in comments in where he seemed to defend himself and suggest he didn't owe Lewinsky an apology, saying at the time: "No, I do not -- I have never talked to her.

But I did say publicly on more than one occasion that I was sorry. That's very different. The apology was public. Read More. Clinton later admitted that the defense was not his "finest moment" and said he felt "terrible" that the affair had defined Lewinsky's life.

As for her own portrayal in the series, Lewinsky said Tuesday that it was important the show didn't do any "photoshopping" of her life. I think, first of all, I shouldn't get a pass in general.

You know, I think it's important to take responsibility for mistakes, and I've worked hard to work through those," she said. Social media companies 'need to do better'. There is significant, and inevitable, overlap between the two docuseries—similar interviews conducted, similar stories told—but the two shows have another thing in common, as well: Neither offers a concisely specific argument about the overarching questions of the Clinton affair—how to think about it, what it all meant, who was right in it, who was wrong.

Instead, the series captures a different kind of truth: the way the events, of the s and the early s, and then of and and and beyond, never, strictly speaking, ended. Each story serves as a reminder that the past tense is also the present. The metastatic expansion of partisanship, from mere ideological disagreement into ceaseless, take-no-prisoners blood sport.

The ratification of hour cable news, with its incentives toward argument and outrage, as one of the primary facts of the American informational landscape. The political power of the religious right. The emergence of the conservative blogosphere. Sexism that often manifested in the way political backlash so often will : as innocent comedy. As jokes just jokes! So much has changed since then.

I mean, how it was presented to the country initially is how it continues to be referred to today, which is an affair , the Lewinsky affair. What it was was a series of encounters to address a physical need, a use of a young girl, and then the sort of cold, hard dismissal of her on any human level.

In the process, the two docuseries revel in the extreme contingencies of history: the fact that, had things gone just a little bit differently, Monica might still be, for most Americans, anonymous; Bill Clinton might never have been impeached; Al Gore might have gotten elected; and … you can fill in several of the fancifully counterfactual blanks from there.

She suggests that his behavior toward her, in which he variously gave her gifts Leaves of Grass , showered her with compliments, and ignored her, going silent for long periods of time, is what ultimately led her to share the details of the affair with Tripp.

How stupid am I that I believed this, that I bought this? I felt so deflated, and so desperate. And those were the conditions, along with some other things, that led to me confiding in Linda Tripp. Currie happened not to pick up.