How do nations settle disputes today

The WTO has one of the most active international dispute settlement mechanisms in the world. Since , disputes have been brought to the WTO and over rulings have been issued. Appeals are handled by the permanent seven-member Appellate Body which is set up by the Dispute Settlement Body and broadly represents the range of WTO membership.

Now, rulings are automatically adopted unless there is a consensus to reject a ruling — any country wanting to block a ruling has to persuade all other WTO members including its adversary in the case to share its view. Although much of the procedure does resemble a court or tribunal, the preferred solution is for the countries concerned to discuss their problems and settle the dispute by themselves.

The first stage is therefore consultations between the governments concerned, and even when the case has progressed to other stages, consultation and mediation are still always possible. How long to settle a dispute? These approximate periods for each stage of a dispute settlement procedure are target figures — the agreement is flexible.

In addition, the countries can settle their dispute themselves at any stage. Totals are also approximate. What is this agreement called? If the courts find themselves handling an increasing number of criminal cases, does that mean law and order is breaking down? Not necessarily. Sometimes it means that people have more faith in the courts and the rule of law. They are turning to the courts instead of taking the law into their own hands.

For the most part, that is what is happening in the WTO. No one likes to see countries quarrel. But if there are going to be trade disputes anyway, it is healthier that the cases are handled according to internationally agreed rules.

There are strong grounds for arguing that the increasing number of disputes is simply the result of expanding world trade and the stricter rules negotiated in the Uruguay Round; and that the fact that more are coming to the WTO reflects a growing faith in the system. It monitors the implementation of the rulings and recommendations, and has the power to authorize retaliation when a country does not comply with a ruling. First stage: consultation up to 60 days. Before taking any other actions the countries in dispute have to talk to each other to see if they can settle their differences by themselves.

If that fails, they can also ask the WTO director-general to mediate or try to help in any other way. Second stage: the panel up to 45 days for a panel to be appointed, plus 6 months for the panel to conclude. If consultations fail, the complaining country can ask for a panel to be appointed. Officially, the panel is helping the Dispute Settlement Body make rulings or recommendations.

Article 33 of the Charter states that any dispute that is likely to endanger the maintenance of international peace and security should first be addressed through negotiation, mediation or other peaceful means, and states that the Council can call on the parties to use such means to settle their dispute.

The Repertoire has covered communications from States addressed to the Security Council highlighting prior attempts to resolve situations, discussions relating to the parties responsibilities to resolve their conflicts and other related material.

For information relating to Article 33 in recent years, please see section E below. Article 34 of the Charter empowers the Security Council to investigate any dispute, or any situation that is likely to endanger international peace and security. The Repertoire covers investigations and fact-finding missions mandated by the Security Council in the framework of Article 34 of the Charter, also taking into consideration fact-finding missions by the Secretary-General to which the Council expressed its support or of which it took note.

Additional procedures relating to conciliation shall be adopted by the Conference of the Parties, as soon as practicable, in an annex on conciliation. The provisions of this Article shall apply to any related legal instrument which the Conference of the Parties may adopt, unless the instrument provides otherwise.

Previous Index Next.