Can i connect hub to router

Michael Christie Posted March 1, 0 Comments. Sent from my iPod. I see no reason why could not connect them via network port? Register or Login. Welcome back! Reset Your Password We'll send an email with a link to reset your password. Stay ahead! Get the latest news, expert insights and market research, tailored to your interests. Sign in with email Enter the email address associated with your account.

Specificities servers - Processors servers. Backup, network storage. Remote connection. Wireless network. Electric protections: UPS, circuit breaker,.. Structures network exercise: infrastructure of company connection.

Various network technologies. Touch screen and projector. Connection ADSL - router. ADSL splitter installation. Hub repeater - 2. Ethernet switch - 3. Router - 4. Repeater - 5. Difference between a hub and a switch - 6. Ethernet Connection. The chapter preceding allowed us to study the types of Ethernet networks. This chapter will analyze the operation of Ethernet concentrators in stars topologies hub, switch, routers, The choice of the type of hub varies depending on the importance of the network, the location of the hub in the design and the inter-connection of networks.

The Ethernet hub's are obsolete. Hub are used in Ethernet bases 10 and bases Hub is the simplest concentrator. It is practically only one repeater it is its French name. It amplifies the signal to be able to transfer it towards all connected PC. All information arriving on the equipment is thus transmitted on all the lines.

In the case of important networks by the number of connected PC or the importance of the flow of transferred information, one cannot use HUB. Indeed, as soon as a PC says something, everyone hears it and when each one starts to transmit, speeds decrease directly. The HUB are characterized by a number of connection: 4, 5, 8, 10, 16, According to the version and the model, they integrate some characteristics of connection specific to the equipment. Hubs bases 10 : numbers of ports RJ45 according to the model, port reverse this one makes it possible to connect two Hubs between-them, avoiding the use of a cross cable RJ45 , a connection coaxial.

By connection, one finds a led announcing connection to a chart and a led of collision per channel or for the unit. The latter announces the state of the whole of connections. Hubs bases : numbers of ports RJ45 according to the model, port reverse this one makes it possible to connect two Hubs between-them , never of connection coaxial. A last remark, according to the standard, the maximum number of HUB in cascade connected port to port, by stackable types is limited to 4 between 2 stations for the 10 base T and to 2 for the base T.

It could be that the collision is not detected in time and that the second transmitting station sends the message by thinking that the way is free. This does not exist for the switch "blind and forward" which record the screens before sending them and segment the network according to connections, avoiding these collisions.

On receiving information, a switch decodes the header frame for do not send that to the port Ethernet combined, which reduces traffic on all network cabling from a HUB that returns data on all ports, reducing the bandwidth causing more than collisions. Each switch uses a table of correspondence address MAC - connection number and an IP address as you might think. Rest to see how it will work in practice. I propose a small vocabulary.

An Ethernet port is one of the switch a connector communication ports. Moreover, these two types are managed configurable. In contrast to the hubs, the majority of the switches can use full duplex.

The communication is two-way, doubling the maximum transfer rate. A Switch automatically checks if the connected device is compatible full or half duplex. This function is often included under the term "Auto-negotiation". This means that the port will automatically detect the crossing of cables for the Ethernet connection. In the case of the HUB, a port equipped with a push button, takes over the function manually. You can still use crossed cables to connect hubs between them.

The switch used to reduce collisions on the network cabling. When a device wants to communicate, it sends a message on the wire. If another device is communicating already, two messages occur at the same time on the network causing a collision.

The first resumed his message at the beginning and the second waiting to retry a few milliseconds later. There in theory no limitation of the number of switches cascading over a network.

At starting, a switch will build a table of correspondence between addresses MAC and port connection number. This table is an internal memory storage of the switch. By against, for a model of lower range D-Link OF the D of 24 ports it is also of entries, for the majority of the switches 5 ports, it varies from to entries.

This does not pose problems for a small network but well for large networks. Depending on the printers and your tinkering ability, get a RaspberryPi, it can do both without issue as long as the printers are supported in linux.

Or, if you can expand your budget, look into a Synology or other NAS. Better way to share storage on a network, and you can attach USB printers to them and share them out. Even better, the Synology can take an already networked printer, and make it available to Apple devices via AirPrint. Lots of good ideas I've considered the RaspPi. I'm not saying that rebooting it is a big deal, but my significant other is happy with her circa laptop.

The external HD's are required. NAS doesn't work for me. Things are sounding grim. I'm going to investigate a more expensive router I'm upgrading from a Linksys 54G, which was the reason for this thread. I know I can get at least 2 usb ports on an Asus, then I'll deal with the hard drives separately.

You could probably set up automatic backups as well to the drive inside the NAS. FrisbeeFreek wrote: The external HD's are required. You're effectively using the router as a very very very terrible NAS by connecting an external drive to it. If your requirement is the ability to remove an external drive from it easily, a NAS can still accommodate external USB drives, depending on the format.

To answer the OP's question, yes it'll work. But just because it'll work doesn't mean it should be done. As others have said, performance will be terrible. HellDiver wrote: To answer the OP's question, yes it'll work.

Ok ok, you guys have convinced me. Shame, because I think a lot of your average non-tech consumers including me could benefit from this most smart TV's have DLNA capability, and putting a 1TB drive on the router would be an easy way to load your media library. I'm assuming it's a firmware problem that the major router manufacturers can't be bothered to fix?

In a hub, a frame is passed along or "broadcast" to every one of its ports. It doesn't matter that the frame is only destined for one port.

The hub has no way of distinguishing which port a frame should be sent to. With this information, a network switch can identify which system is sitting on which port. So when a frame is received, it knows exactly which port to send it to, without significantly increasing network response times. So regardless of the number of PCs transmitting, users will always have access to the maximum amount of bandwidth.

Unlike an Ethernet hub or switch that is concerned with transmitting frames, a router is to route packets to other networks until that packet ultimately reaches its destination.