Code documentation generation tool for .net

->>>> Click Here to Download <<<<<<<-

But I'm not promoting them in any way. GhostDoc is a Visual Studio extension that automatically generates XML documentation comments for methods and properties based on their type, parameters, name, and other contextual information.

VSdocman is an ultimate, fast and easy to use. X is a combination of an automated documentation tool and a full authoring environment which can be used to create, publish and maintain accurate, professional quality documentation for.

HelpStudio is the fastest, easiest way to create and publish procedures, documentation and help systems and integrate them with your desktop, web or mobile applications or components.

Doc-O-Matic is a software source code documentation and Help authoring tool. Doc-O-Matic takes source code and comments, adds conceptual topics and external input and produces documentation from it. Monodoc is a set of libraries and applications for viewing and editing Mono class library documentation. NET libraries, fast and easy.

View documentation live. Free and open source. Sandcastle Help File Builder supports. NET Core projects as of the v Release notes for version There are two Sandcastle projects, the original Sandcastle from Microsoft which is no longer under active development, and the Sandcastle Help File Builder. Another alternative is one I just recently created called Doxie. It's built on Aurelia and uses Bootstrap, which makes it easily themeable. It still has some limitations though, but if you want something open source and relatively easy to use, this may be adequate..

NET Core assemblies as well. You can also try Aistant. It's a fully-featured service for creating, managing and publishing documentation for your product or service. You can customize the look and feel of your documentation webpages, assign your own domain or even embed to your own website.

It still works using EntityFrameworkCore, but you must specificate an assembly reference "netstandard". Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Stack Overflow for Teams — Collaborate and share knowledge with a private group. X handles a lot more than. It is loaded with features, such as the ability to generate help files that integrate directly into Visual Studio's help; that is a must-have for developers writing libraries.

X may be one of the most expensive options around, but it could very well be worth the price for your team. Doc-O-Matic is a recent entry to the code documentation space. In addition to being able to produce code for. Along with documenting the source code, it can also create application-level help. It comes in a variety of editions, allowing you to pick the one that meets your needs and keep your costs down. The top end edition is quite pricey.

Another open source choice is Doxygen. This is super cool. It does not. In fact nothing between the fence in the. It instead shows whatever was in the. There seems to be no way to host this, whether statically or on a dynamic server.

I see a feature request for publishing statically, but without something more, this feels like a neat toy to play with locally but not something shareable. Is that right? NET Meetup Events. Web apps with ASP.

NET Core. Mobile apps with Xamarin. Microservices with Docker Containers. Modernizing existing. NET apps to the cloud. Create Interactive. NET Documentation with Try. NET Maria. Senior Program Manager , Visual Studio and. NET Follow. F has a somewhat strange history This became problematic for edge cases and regenerating when changing the source for the template i. I also ran into cases where there was a high inventory of carrying code that I wasn't using, but was generated from my template.

Did all those methods work? Maybe, maybe not. Going in and cleaning up the generated code would have been a huge amount of work i. Micro Code Generation, in contrast, allows me to generate exactly the classes I need, in exactly the right scenario I want.

The primary tool I use to do this is ReSharper. The way I do this is by writing my unit tests before writing my production code. In that scenario, ReSharper uses my Unit Test as a template to auto-generate the skeleton for the production code.

Then it's just a matter of filling in the blanks. For Data Access, I'm no longer generating anything. Given that, I will never write or generate another data access layer in my life I refuse to. Since Fog Creek Software's in-house language, Wasabi, has compile-time code generators built in, we use them to automatically create the meat of our entity classes that map to database tables.

So instead of writing a class with a dozen different properties and methods, we can just write:. Code generation in the spirit of compilers can be great. Code generation in the spirit of "wizards" has uniformly turned out to be a bad idea. We used to use CodeSmith to generate our NHibernate hbms, our entities, and a few other things. After a while we got sick of this flow so we ditched it.

I create my own tools for some tasks. Its fun to do and even saves time in the long run. For very dull tasks, it even saves your sanity. Home-brewed code generators work great for building unittest cases from end-user spreadsheets that contain examples of how it should work. See Tooling to Build Test Cases for one example. You point the generator at the database your using, select which tables you want to use and it churns out the classes needed.

It is all very quick and easy. We have an in-house built code generator that takes care of database access. One writes stored procedures and gets corresponding methods abstracted in a gateway class.

We also generate web services in order to properly interface with Flash -- i. Finally we have an exception generator that takes away the drudgery of exception best practices tons of constructors, etc At a previous employer, we had a home-grown VB.

We just started using Grails here in the office. Grails wins. The code generation from Grails is very nice and can get you a CRUD app going in about 15 minutes, without actually putting the code in the code files!

Of course, it CAN generate the actual code into the code files, when you want to modify it. Most of the time, for regular CRUD, you can get away with just changing the views. I've used one to generate serializable data objects which could be reformed across different platforms windows, linux, solaris, mac, bsd, etc.