35mm negative slide converter scanner for pc

->>>> Click Here to Download <<<<<<<-

If you're like one of the millions of people who have boxes of slide carousels in the attic or a stack of those little yellow boxes in the kitchen, Slides 2 PC is perfect for you! Don't know what happened to your projector?

Don't know where to buy a replacement bulb for your projector? Slides 2 PC eliminates the hassle and brings those memories of family dinners, graduations, vacations, and joyous occasions back into your life.

Just install the included software on your computer, connect Slides 2 PC using the attached cable, and load up to 20 slides into the included Rapid Slide Feeder for quick, hassle-free scanning; you'll be reliving all of your treasured memories in no time! A blue light even indicates when Slides 2 PC is correctly connected to your computer and ready to scan. Slides 2 PC is a high-resolution scanner with a high-quality optic element. This outstanding attention to quality ensures that you can capture all of the color and detail in each one of your slides or negatives.

Fixed-focus range, automatic exposure and color balance guarantee that your memories are captured optimally with accurate color conversion and perfect imaging. Don't let your memories collect dust or turn yellow one day longer! Enjoy them every day and share them with Slides 2 PC. First name. Last name. Email address. Date of birth. Password Password Strength: No Password. Password confirmation.

Helena St. The scanning speed is absolutely fast which takes up to 2 seconds while the preview speed can take only up to 0. Though it is not recommended for big project scanning, the features this scanner have is a great value for money. If you have a large number of 35mm slides and 35mm film negatives that you want to turn into digital photos, these are all great options that will provide what you need.

These slide and film scanner reviews should be a great way for you to determine the kind of machine that you want and that you are able to afford. Now you will be able to take all of those memoirs that you had stored in boxes and upload them to your computer, website or social media pages. We recommend that you invest on the best quality you can find if you have a large collection of slides or films that need to be converted to a digital format.

Please guide me to purchase a film scanner which can be used professionally without hampering the quality of the scanned output to even the slightest.

It should automatically remove the dust and scratches of the original and give a sharp and vivid output to the fullest satisfaction of the customer. I would like to use it for business purpose. Kindly also let me know the price of the same.

The Epson have Digital Ice which is created to remove dust and scratches. Use a drum scanner. Find a big room to put it in, and spend a lot of time learning how to use it. Used, expect to pay several thousand and make sure it works before purchase. Imacon are marketed as drum scanners. They are not. Epson V whatever, Nikon coolscan, Plustek are not professional devices. They barely get above optical dpi and 3. Fine for home use, not for professional results.

Gosh Joe, we have All done with Nikon Coolscans. Everything in this list and your suggestions is utterly trash. I sold my V3xx and bought the V, and boy was I ticked off when the images looked the same!!

The Nikons were so good that they appreciated in value more than twice inflation. You have a better chance of seeing God than finding one of these models, parts-complete in the original box. The reason why junk scanners sell is because almost no one alive remembers what a slide through a projector looks like compared to a JPEG on a monitor. A 4K monitor? More like 4, times worse than seeing a real slide in person. Drum scanners? Thanks, Harold for the real life what scanner to buy tip!

Some of these comments make my head spin. Would your suggestions of the Epson v or Epson v be the same for scanning old slides and negatives in museum collections?

We have a large number of slides and negatives we need to scan to digital that are in our collections, several from long term archaeological projects done in the s to s. Most of slide film used was Kodachrome.

We will be scanning to a new iMac. The Epson v, V or V are great for scanning tons of old slides and film negatives. What I like about the Epson is its Digital Ice technology which automatically removes dust, hair, scratches or other obstructions.

The PowerSlide is also good option only for 35mm slide scanning. It can scan slide by batch up to 50 slides nonstop at a time. It depends on what you mean by large number. You will not get dust removal so you will need to unmount the slides and clean them. It might take a week to unmount and clean slides. Only silverfast studio AI has dust and scratch removal for kodachrome. Also Kodachrome images will come out blueish unless you use an IT8 target for color.

I would spend a week unmounting the slides and cleaning them and then use the dust and scratch removal in photoshop to fix the rest. I have already scanned multiple thousands of 35mm slide scans using a flatbed photo scanner no longer available HP Scanjet G that was many times faster than the work you describe and more than met the needs of my customers.

You might have to actually learn some stuff. Hi, I have the Epson v to scan my 35 mm negatives. Is there a device that does such a thing? Do you mean previewing the negatives?

Try the Loupe Magnifiers. Hi, I use the V also. I guess it might be useful if you have hundreds of 35mm negs like I do. I just look with a loupe on my lightbox and then scan the strip on the V and keep the ones I like.

My job: present each family member a CD with pictures and history. Is there a scanner or process that would make this easier? Any thoughts on which scanner or software that would help me save our family history as Dad intended? Thank you so much. It is actually the software that can append those captions. You can do the caption through Photoshop. I have a chance to pick up the Nikon at a fair price. Thank you.

The Epson V is rather advanced than the Nikon Coolscan. The Epson V is not just a film and slide scanner but also a photo and document scanner. Though both use Digital Ice which is a great feature for fixing those scratches on images. Is there a special insert for metal slide jackets that I can order or do I have to remove each slide from the metal jacket?

I also have inherited thousands of slides in jackets and magazines. Above reply mentions removing the jackets which appears to be a tedious exercise. Any suggestions on how to do it? Whats the real difference in the V and the F? I mean money is not the issue however the resolutions seem about the same. I am going to do a family project of 1, of photos and want the best quality. I was thinking of the FF but that idea is blown out of the water because most photos are in a folder.

The Epson v and v have superb image quality output. What I like about these scanners is its digital ice features which detects and corrects scratches and removes dust on photos. However using the digital ice makes the scanning slow. On the other hand, the F Mark II is also great scanner. It is simple and easy to use. However the scans are not that excellent but not bad either. In terms of energy efficiency, there is an Epson v which is Energy Star Certified.

I have Windows 10 on my laptop. Any advice would be appreciated. What I would recommend is to debug. Uninstall the drivers and try to install it one by one. I have no conflicts between two drivers installed on the same OS. Thanks for that. Maybe it was just a HP thing. I just tried and returned the Jumbl 22MP. I got it to replace an older Jumbl 5 MP, hoping for better resolution. The new Jumbl often got colors badly wrong — yellow or green in excess. The older Jumbl scanned the same negatives without problems.

The 5MP Jumbl is fast and easy. The Jumble 22MP was a disappointment — perhaps I just got a bad unit. I have an old Konica-Minolta Dimage scanner, however that software is no longer supported and does not work in Windows. It is also a very slow slide scanner. Have you tried to clean the lens of Jumbl 22MP or the films you want to scan? You can preview the image first and adjust the color and exposure. Regarding with batch slide scanning, the PowerSlide is a good option while Wolverine F2D Mighty 20MP 7-in-1 or is a good for fast 35mm film scanning.

I usually choose the autofeed scanners rather than flatbed when scanning hundreds of films. Is there another scanner that will do batch?

You will be amazed by its scanning speed but the output is not good. I use the autofeed scanners when scanning multiple films and slides. The PowerSlide is by far the best option for batch scanning. Can you recommend a stand alone scanner for photos?

I am trying to digitize a photo collection for my hometown Historical Society and would like higher res stand alone photo scanning on site that I can clean up later on my computer.

Hi, I will be starting a project of scanning thousands of family 35mm negatives and slides. I am in the market for a high end scanner that has an output that allows for image manipulation in Adobe CC. Should I be looking for a scanner that produces RAW files? What would you suggest? Do you need fast scanning method or just the typical flatbed or auto fed scanners?

This limits you to a few options. Plustek makes OK scanners, the Pacific Image PrimeFilmXA is a few notches higher output—it deals with darker slides better and has adjustable focus. Upgrade to silverfast AI studio. It makes a difference in output as it allows focusing for the Pacific Image and also produces high bit raw files.

Get your negatives perfectly flat. Lay heavy books on top of them for several weeks to flatten the film. Sort your slides by type-kodachrome, ektachrome, fujichrome, etc.

Buy an IT8 target slide for better color-and use the auto calibrate function in Silverfast. Each particular scanner will produce slightly different color. DO not use infrared dust removal for kodachrome slides-it does not work properly. Buy a fast computer with a large SSD drive.

Silverfast produces very large RAW files mbmb a piece. I have , lots, maybe thousands of photos and negatives, and some slides that I want to digitize. I am not too concern about resolution. Enough for uploading to Facebook or view online. Speed is of the essence, or my key concern. I think I probably have negatives for my print photos.

Hence, if I can get something that can scan negatives and slides quickly, that is good enough for me. Ideally something that can feed negative strips quickly. If that can load on its own in batches without me watching over it, all the more better. I have read the above reviews quickly but am unsure which meets the above criteria. Thanks for any advice. Both are fast scanners. I would like to have a scanner which produces good colours and is fast, which one would you recommend?

However, there is also options to adjust color and exposure like the Jumbl 22MP. On the other hand, beautiful scanned images are not created just through scanning directly but there are software to optimize the color, saturation, exposure etc. So much choice and so many mixed reviews!

I have Windows 10 now. The Epson v is a great choice if you want it to be connected to your computer. However, if you want a stand alone that requires no computer connection, the Jumbl 22MP or Wolverine F2D are the best, for entry to mid level at least.

It is brand new — never used. Do you know anything about it? I am using a 64mb SC card but it keeps telling me the memory card is full when the card is empty. I even tried reformatting it. Also do you know where I can get technical support since it is an older product? Do you mean SD card? And where did you buy the scanner?

Go for the Epson V It has an excellent resolution and can accommodate for that size. If you have that much of negatives, I say scan at a time. The V requires that I snip the roll into short strips, scanning I guess 6 frames each time, and then have film strips instead of a roll. That is labor intensive, slow, and undesirable results of possibly having the strips out of order. That is why I am not considering a flat bed scanned of which I have 2 high resolution ones. Other suggestion for something that can handle a roll?

I understand, but try the Wolverine F2D. Be sure to clean your negatives first for best results. That scanner will handle a bunch of films and it is fast. Plustek OpticFilm i SE has a very good speed scanning too and has scratch and dust removal technology but will stretch out your pocket. How long are your stitched films by the way? They are standard 35 mm rolls with frames each. About pcs all in all? Can you be more specific about the film designation? Wonder if anyone could help me, I am looking to get some 12 x 8 prints made from 35mm slides, the slides are historic and it is important to try and get the best possible quality prints they can provide.

I have already some prints made by a company that I sent them to, they used a Fuji Frontier printer at ppi. My question is ppi seems awfully low especially when I see other scanners have over ppi capability. Can anyone please point me in the right direction and advise what would be a good scanner to buy to reproduce at high quality. How many are those 35mm slides? Both have superb scanning resolution up to x dpi for prints. They produce high quality prints for slides and films.

The Digital ICE helps with the quality output. Scanplify Hi. Thank you for your advice. I guess I have approx slides so quite a number! It seems a lot of people recommend the Epson v, any other thoughts would be welcome and I am very grateful for any advice. You are welcome Gary! I like the v a lot though it takes time scanning films and slides. Man its a tedious job but worth it.

And v is an efficient scanner, a certified Energy Star. Scanplify Great! Thanks again for the advice, off to source an Epson v scanner! I would imagine the resolution difference is negligible and most buyers would be happy with V? Oh dilemma!

However, if your requirements are met by v, go for it since you need a high quality prints with an excellent DPI. Hi, I have read all the reviews and am confused as to what scanner would suit me best for the job in hand. I have mixed slide manufacturers in cardboard and plastic mounts and would like a good result but have limited funds.

Are there scanners that do multi loading? Can you help please? The Wolverine Titan 20MP is great choice for that. The V is also a good option for that. It has a great quality output for slides. Also, have you considered the Kodak Scanza?

Scanplify Hello again! Been doing my research on the Epson v How can an advertised high end product be so far off the mark?! I understand online reviews can not always be relied upon and there is no other remarks to substantiate such a claim but your views and that of the readers would be most welcome. Thank you in advance. By the way what particular size of prints you wish to print? I am looking to get 12 x 8 prints from 35mm slides. Obviously I would like to send the best possible digital files to the printers.

I am leaning towards the Epson V but need to be sure before committing to buy! Sorry for late replies. I am busy with work. I believe you can achieve that with v or v, even the v will do.

I hope you get the right scanner for that job but I would like to share an article for you to achieve the best quality prints from your 35mm slides. Does anyone know of a scanner that can digitize one of the two 35 mm slides on a mounted stereo 3D slide?

Scanning 3D stereo slides is very tricky. But you need to improvise or scan one image. Thanks for this scanner. I suggest your testers might want to compare results with the output of the unbelievably stable and reliable Nikon LS Super Coolscan ED, especially paired with the 35mm slide feeder SF — 60 cardboard-mounted slides at a shot. Pros: Off the market more than a decade, a simple PD add-on. Third-party scanner software available offers decreased quality and no bulk support.

Quality is near-perfect, even with year-old slides — post-production work is necessary on any old film to properly rebalance color. Takes up to 2 min. Final report — let it run all day — places little load on anything beyond a MHz Pentium, removes newton-ring deposits built up on slides Deterioration, not glass-mounts. Short question to the scanners; do they show the negative film as a positive image on the LCD Display?

If not all, which one does? Any recomandation? Please advice. Best regards Roy Heitmann. I have my mind just about made up to purchase an Epson V scanner.

There are two things I cannot find an answer for. How long would it take to scan slides. With my current machine, it takes me about 50 minutes. It depends on what resolution you want your slide digitized. The V has 4 mounted slides with 4 frames in it. Without using the Digital ICE and assuming you are scanning at the lowest resolution it could be faster compared to your current machine. I have a Braun slide scanner that scans batches using a slide round tray. I am wondering if there is any scanner available that will do the same thing but with a Kodak 80 slide tray so I do not need to remove every slide from the Kodak tray, put it in the Braun tray to scan and then return it back into the Kodak tray.

I believe you can do it with Pacific Image Powerslide however it is now discontinued by the manufacturer. Thanks for asking about this. I will have to contact some manufacturers if they are compatible with round Kodak round trays since they widely available.

I now have upgraded my desk top to a Windows 10 model with an SSD main memory.